Buying banks, oil and cars ahead of stagflation?!
The recession is getting closer. Higher interest rates, higher electricity prices and high petrol prices take away consumption and investment space from both consumers and businesses. The market hasn't really bought into this yet – so far only valuation multiples have been lowered. When, in addition, the forecasts start to be revised down, yes, then the stock market will probably fall in the second half. That would be consistent with historical patterns, where it has normally been the case that the second and third thirds of a bear market, calculated in time, produced larger declines than the first third.
It has been about nine
months since the stock market decline began. maybe it's almost as long left.
Normally we would then have more than half the race ahead of us. Yes, -30% more
from here for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq in time until hope can be ignited for
new stimulus next fall fits well with my view of the economy, inflation,
central bank decisions and the 2024 US presidential election.
Inflation is
considered the worst threat, a threat that the Federal Reserve wants to combat
by all means. It is done in the same clumsy way that the "deflation
threat" would be countered with "whatever it takes", which is
the reason why we now have an inflation problem at all. The alleged deflation
problem of 2009-2021 was, of course, only an effect of the crashed house price
bubble, which the Fed had created in response to the IT crash of 2000-2003.
That IT stocks had such unjustifiably high levels to crash from was due, as is
well known, to the fact that, yes, precisely that, Fed chief Greenspan gave the
green light for an IT bubble in the second half of the 90s.
Even at the absolute
peak in March 2000, it was claimed from the central bank that you can never
recognize a bubble until afterwards. But, yes, there are always signs and
markers, such as Michael Burry very rightly noted. Many experienced investors
with fantastic returns gave relatively timely warnings about unreasonably high
valuations both in 1999-2000, 2006-2007, 2019 and 2021. But the central banks
go to war, always with what they consider to be the perfect answer to the
problems of the last crisis. Precisely because of this, they create greater and
greater imbalances, increasingly desperate and large, unproven experimental
measures, which cause ever greater fluctuations. The question this time is
whether the downward swing will also reach record highs and the resulting
valuations record lows, or whether the bankers will give up early again.
In the latter case,
the Fed and the ECB would soon follow in the footsteps of the Bank of England
and start the money presses again. Unfortunately, it would likely cause even
worse disasters down the line, as if needed when there is war in Europe, Russia
(maybe) bombs its own gas pipeline to force Germany and the EU into submission
this winter. But in the short term capitulating central banks are likely to be
good for stock prices, cryptocurrencies and precious metals. A pivot to renewed
stimulus before inflation has been overcome means that the transition to a new
economic system is accelerated. And then it is mainly the debtor side of the
economy that is erased, which means problems for pensioners, cash, wage earners
and consumers, while real assets in some cases retain or increase their
relative value. Typically, however, it gets worse for everyone in such an
environment, so it is important to try to improve one's relative position as
much as possible.
Among the news today,
e.g. the recent problems of Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank. Their problems seem
to never end after the headless expansion of the early 2000s. They may risk
dragging more European banks with them in the case and, in the worst case,
shaking also the EU itself to its foundations when certain countries want to be
able to stimulate their own economies and save their banks on their own terms without
the forms being dictated from the central EU side. Greece, Spain and Italy are,
as always, the usual suspects.
Personally, I see US
oil companies as relatively the strongest card in the stock market. Inflation,
geopolitical unrest, deglobalization, marginalization of Russia and more all
point to much higher oil prices. In fact, so does the transition to renewable
energy. It takes enormous amounts of energy to dig up the minerals needed to
build solar cells and wind turbines – and for the construction itself. In the
short perspective, the energy must be taken from coal, oil and natural gas; and
only in 10 years' time perhaps from new nuclear power plants. In the even
longer term, solar and wind can become self-sufficient, i.e. produce more
energy than is required for the expansion of new solar and wind parks, but then
we start talking about a 15-20 year horizon. It is lucky that even Germany discusses
restarting nuclear power plants and not shutting down its last three.
Despite the incipient banking crisis in Europe,
I still see Nordic banks as good investments in the coming year. They are
already cheap on reported earnings and earnings forecasts and it is highly
unlikely that their core business or credit losses are significantly affected
by problems for CS and DB, including secondary effects. The declines today,
Monday for e.g. Danske bank and Swedbank may very well be really good buy
positions, but of course you still have to respect that the now negative market
psychology behind investments in banks first requires reassuring quarterly
reports to turn around.
Mini Futures
For most stocks and
industries the same applies, look for relatively safe industries, industries
that can increase margins when interest rates, commodity prices and electricity
prices skyrocket, but don't buy everything at once. So don't try to spot an
exact bottom, but average in the coming likely second half of this decline and
position yourself in good time for a Fed pivot in the second half of 2023.
A somewhat unexpected
sector to look at may be the automotive industry. Porsche was listed last week,
which could increase interest in car manufacturers in general. In addition, all
petrol car manufacturers now have electric alternatives, so the negative ESG
label is being washed away. At the same time, it has the side effect of
pressuring Tesla. With each passing quarter, Tesla's lead in electric cars is
being eaten away while the company urgently tries in a panic to change its
image from a car company to a robot and AI company. Unfortunately, things are
going pretty badly on both fronts. The demonstration of Optimus this weekend
showed that Tesla's robot dance is 10-20 years behind companies such as Boston
Dynamics and Honda. And at the same time, Tesla released weak sales figures for
September and Q3. It is therefore increasingly difficult to justify the
purchase of a Tesla car with an old design. The S/3/X and Y are all starting to
get quite a few years behind them and no new models are in the works.
Even the Tesla share
itself is having a hard time, partly because of Elon Musk's increasingly
strange actions, e.g. sounded like he announced his own departure this weekend,
but also that there are now loads of more modern options from real car companies
in all price segments. Tesla is being eaten up by companies like Porsche and
BMW from one side and Renault and Honda from the other. In addition, Musk
himself is busy buying Twitter, which could force more stock sales this fall
after the lawsuit over the acquisition in mid-October.
It probably feels a
bit premature to buy mainstream car manufacturers like GM, Ford, Honda, Toyota,
Renault, Volkswagen and Porsche just before the mother of all stagflation
strikes at the same time with an energy crisis, but the turnaround may come
sooner than you think. I believe that the absolute bottom in stock prices for
cyclically sensitive sectors such as autos and retail will occur in the second
quarter of 2023. This is because things stop getting worse at an increasing
rate and because valuations have simply become so low that real value investors
are attracted back into the market. The key will be when the Fed swings to new
stimulus, and to try to find a point some six months before that happens.
Again, the best way to
ride the upswing is to average all the way through the next year's slump in
stable companies that can finance themselves and have strong balance sheets, as
well as low implied normalized Profit / Earnings P/E ratios. There are banks,
oil companies and actually even some old car companies. However, certainly not
Tesla, which is more likely to be the last stone to fall before you can put an
end to this round of crashes for tech companies. If Tesla is to be valued in
roughly the same way as other successful car companies, we will probably be
talking about just over one times sales, or upwards of 100 billion dollars in
enterprise value. That corresponds to a share price of just over 30 dollars. In
that light, Honda and Renault, relatively speaking, or for that matter Porsche
and Volkswagen, look extremely much more interesting - stagflation or not.
This information is in the sole responsibility of the guest author and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Bank Vontobel Europe AG or any other company of the Vontobel Group. The further development of the index or a company as well as its share price depends on a large number of company-, group- and sector-specific as well as economic factors. When forming his investment decision, each investor must take into account the risk of price losses. Please note that investing in these products will not generate ongoing income.
The products are not capital protected, in the worst case a total loss of the invested capital is possible. In the event of insolvency of the issuer and the guarantor, the investor bears the risk of a total loss of his investment. In any case, investors should note that past performance and / or analysts' opinions are no adequate indicator of future performance. The performance of the underlyings depends on a variety of economic, entrepreneurial and political factors that should be taken into account in the formation of a market expectation.